Dan, the question isn't whether or not he was the only 'assisted' lifter ever to take the platform.
The original question is whether utilizing lower rep ranges can build muscle tissue. There are a multitude of factors that go into how muscle is built, and if a lifter utilizes anabolics than it's difficult to determine how effective the training plan is versus the chemical assistance.
I'm not making any moral judgements on anyone's drug use, nor am I making any accusations as I have no idea whether or not he used, but when we're discussing the efficacy of training methods you must take into account these factors.
My only point is that if someone is taking something which turns 'on' protein synthesis in the body than it's really difficult to evaluate the efficacy of their training as their program (rep ranges, load, frequency, etc) isn't the only stimulus for muscle growth. The drugs have to be factored in. I just think it's reductionist to look at world class athletes and take much information for a natural trainee who relies solely on diet and training (and recovery) as stimulus for growth.
Edited by Mr. Kent on 01-21-21 10:40 AM. Reason for edit: No reason given.
