Hypertrophy II -
davedraper.com home Home
This forum is closed as of March 2023.

Quick Links: Main Index | Flight Deck | Training Logs | Dan John Deck | Must Reads | Archive

Display Name Post: Hypertrophy II        (Topic#25243)
Dan John
*
Total Posts: 12292
09-15-10 12:36 PM - Post#646859    




The Problem with Hypertrophy Programs
by Dan John


I spend far too much time with people who want to gain lean body mass.

The problem, among dozens of things, is that most people need to get stronger before they can add mass. I know that somewhere researchers are figuring out an injection to ramp up the body's ability to build mass through some kind of genetic mutation, but for most of us, we're going to head off to the weight room.

And, that's the problem.

The Problem Child

The problem with standard hypertrophy programs, beside their built-in boredom, is the inability to jack up intensity. We tend to let accumulated fatigue — which is good in the case of high-rep squats — limit the load. But by breaking apart the sets just a little bit, you can add more weight to the bar and actually cut rest periods between what we traditionally call "sets."

For example, I've shared an interesting way to do German Volume Training — you remember, the ten sets of ten workouts. Rather than letting reps 60 to 100 dictate the load, we play with this rep scheme: 2-3-5-10. We use the same weight for each set and rep, striving to do a total of five of these clusters. It adds up to 100 reps, with only five sets consisting of that rep-reducing tough set of ten.

What's amazing about this program is that often times when you put the bar down you almost immediately do the double because that set of ten was hard but anybody can do two. Oddly, the triple is done quite quickly, and, as I often think, "Might as well do the five, too."

So, between those hellacious tens, you nail ten more reps with surprising little rest.

If hypertrophy is honestly time under tension, it logically follows that more load (because you aren't doing ten sets of ten and roasting yourself in the process) in less time would lead to greater muscle mass.

Now, you don't have to do 100 reps. Oddly, I've found that doing three clusters (2-3-5-10, 2-3-5-10, 2-3-5-10) seems to be enough for any athlete. It's better to leave a little in the tank, especially for a drug-free athlete, than to go to the edge with this magic 100-rep barrier.

Five Times the Excitement

What's actually more exciting is a very interesting variation on the five by five workout. The reps simply drop out the last set of ten, so we have 2-3-5.

There are two very innovative changes that seem to really work well in the realm of big lifts such as the bench press, the military press, the squat (with all its variations), and the deadlift.

The big issue, of course, is, "What do you mean by five by five?" Here are the two simple innovations for workouts geared towards bulk and power.

First, stick with one weight throughout the workout. Of course, you know that, but with this rep scheme of 2-3-5-2-3-5-2-3, you can handle far more load than the traditional five sets of five. You aren't held back by that heavy last set of five that often forces one to go lighter on the first four sets.

Certainly, some of the options, like the wave, have value, but this has been an issue for many of us for years. Yes, I realize that someone is going to post something like, "I thought five by five was obvious," and then add a whole new variation that no one has ever seen before.

With this first option, the lifter only has to deal with two big sets of five. So, try to find a weight that forces you to give it your all on that second set of five. (Obvious note: Get a good spotter on the bench and squat.)

This is where the same odd rest issue shows up. For whatever reason, and I'm sure the science guys know the biology behind this, it's a quick recovery to get that double in after the heavy set of five. And, once again, since you have nothing better to do, that triple often happens out of breath.

I'd suggest only timing the whole duration of this variation and see how fast all 25 reps are finished. Honestly, it goes fast even with a serious load.

Small reminder: This is not a powerlifting workout! It's intended for those interested in a nice mix of power and bulk. Again, if you have more plates on the bar and the workout finishes faster, isn't that hypertrophy training?

The second option is really opening eyes. The adjustment is so simple that many will dismiss it with an "I've been there, done that" attitude. Well, good for you.

Let's review the second option.

First cluster: 2-3-5

Now, add weight!

Second cluster: 2-3-5

Add more weight.

Third cluster: 2-3-5

Add more weight.

Fourth cluster: 2-3-5

You can use the first cluster as a warm-up of sorts, and what's funny is that the program begins to take on one of the earliest recognized programs in lifting, the DeLorme workout.

Doctor Thomas DeLorme worked with some guys rehabbing from World War II, and he found that weightlifting worked wonders on injury rehabilitation. Originally, he thought that 70 to 100 reps were the key, but later discovered that, "Further experience has shown this figure (the number of sets in a workout) to be too high."

The number of sets was reduced from seven to ten to a much more realistic three sets. During the first set, weight was at 50% of the person's ten-rep max. The second set was increased to 75%, and it finished at 100% of the subject's ten-rep max. This became known as the "DeLorme technique," although a guy named Watkins also authored the study.

This second variation can reflect those numbers except we focus on the five-rep max (a number in many people's experience that rewards bodybuilding training more so than higher reps). Try this variation in a simple workout after any kind of intelligent workout.

I've been training my athletes with the second variation (40 total reps, three plate changes) with the front squat, bench press, and power clean (or the power curl, a curl grip clean using the legs) mixed with some hurdle walkovers and some farmer's walks.

This isn't a fancy workout, but the load really impacts the athletes. If you can do some kind of hurdle walkover or hip mobility work during a training session that has a squat, deadlift, or clean variation, I strongly recommend it. I also like to finish this workout with a farmer's walk, but keep it within reason.

A Problem Solver's Workout

A sample workout might look like this:

Front squat 135 x 2
Bench press 135 x 2
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 135 x 2
Front squat 135 x 3
Bench press 135 x 3
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 135 x 3
Front squat 135 x 5
Bench press 135 x 5
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 135 x 5

Add weight

Front squat 185 x 2
Bench press 185 x 2
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 185 x 2
Front squat 185 x 3
Bench press 185 x 3
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 185 x 3
Front squat 185 x 5
Bench press 185 x 5
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 185 x 5

Add weight

Front squat 205 x 2
Bench press 205 x 2
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 205 x 2
Front squat 205 x 3
Bench press 205 x 3
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 205 x 3
Front squat 205 x 5
Bench press 205 x 5
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 205 x 5

Add weight

Front squat 225 x 2
Bench press 225 x 2
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 225 x 2
Front squat 225 x 3
Bench press 225 x 3
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 225 x 3
Front squat 225 x 5
Bench press 225 x 5
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 225 x 5

Finish with a farmer's walk with 85 pounds in each hand to exhaustion. Then, bring them back.

It's simple stuff. It's simple, but it works.


The Problem with Hypertrophy Programs

What are you getting out of your trips to the gym?
The Problem with Hypertrophy Programs

The Problem with Hypertrophy Programs

Okay, so these tools are deadlifting props instead of real weights, but you get the idea.
The Problem with Hypertrophy Programs

The farmer's walk is the exclamation point at the end of this workout.

© 1998 — 2010 Testosterone, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Daniel John
Just handing down what I was handed down...


Make a Difference.
Live. Love. Laugh.
Balance work, rest, play and pray (enjoy beauty and solitude)
Sleep soundly. Drink Water. Eat veggies and protein. Walk.
Wear your seat belt. Don’t smoke. Floss your teeth.
Put weights overhead. Pick weights off the floor. Carry weights.
Reread great books. Say thank you


 
*
Re: Hypertrophy II
07-04-11 08:59 PM - Post#697125    



  • Dan John Said:

The Problem with Hypertrophy Programs
by Dan John


I spend far too much time with people who want to gain lean body mass.

The problem, among dozens of things, is that most people need to get stronger before they can add mass. I know that somewhere researchers are figuring out an injection to ramp up the body's ability to build mass through some kind of genetic mutation, but for most of us, we're going to head off to the weight room.

And, that's the problem.

The Problem Child

The problem with standard hypertrophy programs, beside their built-in boredom, is the inability to jack up intensity. We tend to let accumulated fatigue — which is good in the case of high-rep squats — limit the load. But by breaking apart the sets just a little bit, you can add more weight to the bar and actually cut rest periods between what we traditionally call "sets."

For example, I've shared an interesting way to do German Volume Training — you remember, the ten sets of ten workouts. Rather than letting reps 60 to 100 dictate the load, we play with this rep scheme: 2-3-5-10. We use the same weight for each set and rep, striving to do a total of five of these clusters. It adds up to 100 reps, with only five sets consisting of that rep-reducing tough set of ten.

What's amazing about this program is that often times when you put the bar down you almost immediately do the double because that set of ten was hard but anybody can do two. Oddly, the triple is done quite quickly, and, as I often think, "Might as well do the five, too."

So, between those hellacious tens, you nail ten more reps with surprising little rest.

If hypertrophy is honestly time under tension, it logically follows that more load (because you aren't doing ten sets of ten and roasting yourself in the process) in less time would lead to greater muscle mass.

Now, you don't have to do 100 reps. Oddly, I've found that doing three clusters (2-3-5-10, 2-3-5-10, 2-3-5-10) seems to be enough for any athlete. It's better to leave a little in the tank, especially for a drug-free athlete, than to go to the edge with this magic 100-rep barrier.

Five Times the Excitement

What's actually more exciting is a very interesting variation on the five by five workout. The reps simply drop out the last set of ten, so we have 2-3-5.

There are two very innovative changes that seem to really work well in the realm of big lifts such as the bench press, the military press, the squat (with all its variations), and the deadlift.

The big issue, of course, is, "What do you mean by five by five?" Here are the two simple innovations for workouts geared towards bulk and power.

First, stick with one weight throughout the workout. Of course, you know that, but with this rep scheme of 2-3-5-2-3-5-2-3, you can handle far more load than the traditional five sets of five. You aren't held back by that heavy last set of five that often forces one to go lighter on the first four sets.

Certainly, some of the options, like the wave, have value, but this has been an issue for many of us for years. Yes, I realize that someone is going to post something like, "I thought five by five was obvious," and then add a whole new variation that no one has ever seen before.

With this first option, the lifter only has to deal with two big sets of five. So, try to find a weight that forces you to give it your all on that second set of five. (Obvious note: Get a good spotter on the bench and squat.)

This is where the same odd rest issue shows up. For whatever reason, and I'm sure the science guys know the biology behind this, it's a quick recovery to get that double in after the heavy set of five. And, once again, since you have nothing better to do, that triple often happens out of breath.

I'd suggest only timing the whole duration of this variation and see how fast all 25 reps are finished. Honestly, it goes fast even with a serious load.

Small reminder: This is not a powerlifting workout! It's intended for those interested in a nice mix of power and bulk. Again, if you have more plates on the bar and the workout finishes faster, isn't that hypertrophy training?

The second option is really opening eyes. The adjustment is so simple that many will dismiss it with an "I've been there, done that" attitude. Well, good for you.

Let's review the second option.

First cluster: 2-3-5

Now, add weight!

Second cluster: 2-3-5

Add more weight.

Third cluster: 2-3-5

Add more weight.

Fourth cluster: 2-3-5

You can use the first cluster as a warm-up of sorts, and what's funny is that the program begins to take on one of the earliest recognized programs in lifting, the DeLorme workout.

Doctor Thomas DeLorme worked with some guys rehabbing from World War II, and he found that weightlifting worked wonders on injury rehabilitation. Originally, he thought that 70 to 100 reps were the key, but later discovered that, "Further experience has shown this figure (the number of sets in a workout) to be too high."

The number of sets was reduced from seven to ten to a much more realistic three sets. During the first set, weight was at 50% of the person's ten-rep max. The second set was increased to 75%, and it finished at 100% of the subject's ten-rep max. This became known as the "DeLorme technique," although a guy named Watkins also authored the study.

This second variation can reflect those numbers except we focus on the five-rep max (a number in many people's experience that rewards bodybuilding training more so than higher reps). Try this variation in a simple workout after any kind of intelligent workout.

I've been training my athletes with the second variation (40 total reps, three plate changes) with the front squat, bench press, and power clean (or the power curl, a curl grip clean using the legs) mixed with some hurdle walkovers and some farmer's walks.

This isn't a fancy workout, but the load really impacts the athletes. If you can do some kind of hurdle walkover or hip mobility work during a training session that has a squat, deadlift, or clean variation, I strongly recommend it. I also like to finish this workout with a farmer's walk, but keep it within reason.

A Problem Solver's Workout

A sample workout might look like this:

Front squat 135 x 2
Bench press 135 x 2
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 135 x 2
Front squat 135 x 3
Bench press 135 x 3
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 135 x 3
Front squat 135 x 5
Bench press 135 x 5
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 135 x 5

Add weight

Front squat 185 x 2
Bench press 185 x 2
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 185 x 2
Front squat 185 x 3
Bench press 185 x 3
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 185 x 3
Front squat 185 x 5
Bench press 185 x 5
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 185 x 5

Add weight

Front squat 205 x 2
Bench press 205 x 2
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 205 x 2
Front squat 205 x 3
Bench press 205 x 3
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 205 x 3
Front squat 205 x 5
Bench press 205 x 5
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 205 x 5

Add weight

Front squat 225 x 2
Bench press 225 x 2
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 225 x 2
Front squat 225 x 3
Bench press 225 x 3
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 225 x 3
Front squat 225 x 5
Bench press 225 x 5
Hurdle walkover or hip mobility movement
Power curl 225 x 5

Finish with a farmer's walk with 85 pounds in each hand to exhaustion. Then, bring them back.

It's simple stuff. It's simple, but it works.


The Problem with Hypertrophy Programs

What are you getting out of your trips to the gym?
The Problem with Hypertrophy Programs

The Problem with Hypertrophy Programs

Okay, so these tools are deadlifting props instead of real weights, but you get the idea.
The Problem with Hypertrophy Programs

The farmer's walk is the exclamation point at the end of this workout.

© 1998 — 2010 Testosterone, LLC. All Rights Reserved.




I'm an ectomorph and being lanky and long tendoned I did more volume with better strength gains for some reason then my old HIT similiar style.
Then I did the weider pyramid 14-12-10-6-8 with periodization I grew stronger and lost more weight. Now I do periodization with the 10x10 german volume training on all bodyparts on my "c" days and lower reps and higher weights on my "b" and "a" days respectfully. Someone who's advice I respect I interpreted advice maybe periodization isn't needed with GVT if a bodybuilder does GVT on the off season. What do you think considering I'm an ectomorph and gained more in 6 months periodizing then 2 years of more intense heavier weights with lower reps. I'm a terrible example because those 2 years I did not eat enough and these last 6 months I got a living protein with 2.5:1 carbs:whey and doubled my calories and started taking creatine, glutamine, and BCAA.

Edited by DLS on 07-04-11 09:03 PM. Reason for edit: No reason given.
 
mprevost
*
Total Posts: 816
Re: Hypertrophy II
03-14-12 10:14 PM - Post#727473    



Wow. Just discovering this. This is a better solution than I came up with. I was finding that even 5 X 5 was causing me to reduce the load too much in order to get the last set, so I switched to 3 X 5, but heavier. I like this idea much better. Logistics in my gym would make clustering the exercises much more workable (do all sets of bench presses, then move to squats). Wonder how well that would work with maybe 30 seconds rest between the first round and moving to 90 seconds by the last round.
www.mikeprevost.com

"The quality of movement, I think, trumps load...unless it is a contest about load." Dan John


 
Quick Links: Main Index | Flight Deck | Training Logs | Dan John Deck | Must Reads | Archive
Topic options
Print topic


11244 Views

Home

What's New | Weekly Columns | Weight Training Tips
General Nutrition | Draper History | Mag Cover Shots | Magazine Articles | Bodybuilding Q&A | Bomber Talk | Workout FAQs
Privacy Policy


Top